Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has recently gained access to critical Treasury data, which includes information related to the distribution of trillions of dollars, such as Social Security and Medicare payments. This move follows the actions of Scott Bessent, who was appointed Treasury Secretary by former President Trump. Bessent granted DOGE access to these systems, despite concerns over the appropriateness of this decision.
David A. Lebryk, who had been serving as the acting Secretary of the Treasury under Trump, unexpectedly retired on Friday after a dispute with Musk regarding access to the Social Security system. The tension between Musk and Lebryk escalated, leading to Lebryk’s departure.
The situation gained more attention when Musk posted on social media about his discoveries after gaining access to the Treasury data. He claimed that Treasury officials had been instructed to approve payments without question, even when the payments were directed to known fraudulent organizations or terrorist groups. However, Musk did not provide any specific evidence to support these claims, raising questions about the accuracy of his statements.
With DOGE now having access to these critical financial systems, Musk has expressed confidence that the department will be able to reduce what he considers wasteful government spending. In a separate post, Musk mentioned that he was “cautiously optimistic” about cutting government expenses by $4 billion a day, starting over the weekend. This statement reflects Musk’s ongoing efforts to streamline government operations and reduce waste.
Democrats, however, have raised concerns about this unprecedented access granted to Musk’s department. Traditionally, access to Treasury data has been limited to career civil servants who are not involved in political operations.

Critics, including Oregon’s Democratic Senator Ron Wyden, have voiced their concerns about the potential risks associated with political figures managing such sensitive systems. Wyden, in particular, expressed his worries about the potential for mismanagement of payment systems, which could undermine the trust and financial stability of the United States government.
Wyden pointed out that he could not see any valid reason for granting political operators, who have previously shown a disregard for the law, control over these vital systems. He also warned that mishandling these systems could jeopardize the public’s trust in the U.S. government’s ability to manage its finances properly.
As the situation develops, many remain uncertain about the future of the Treasury Department under Musk’s influence. While some believe that Musk’s leadership could bring much-needed changes to government spending, others fear that his political involvement could lead to disastrous consequences for the country’s financial stability.
The move has sparked a significant debate, with many questioning whether political figures should have control over the country’s most sensitive financial systems. As the controversy continues, it remains to be seen how Musk’s efforts to reduce government spending will unfold and whether they will have the desired impact or cause more harm than good.
Disclaimer: This article has been meticulously fact-checked by our team to ensure accuracy and uphold transparency. We strive to deliver trustworthy and dependable content to our readers.