Security faces major financial problems. With a funding shortfall exceeding $23 trillion, tough decisions must be made to keep the program sustainable. President Donald Trump has vowed to support seniors, but one of his biggest promises regarding Social Security is unlikely to hold—and breaking it might actually be the best decision.
Social Security’s Financial Struggles: A $23 Trillion Shortfall
To understand why Trump’s promise may not hold, it’s essential to look at the financial health of Social Security. Each year, the Social Security Board of Trustees releases a report analyzing the program’s finances. The latest 2024 report shows that the funding shortfall has grown by $800 billion from the previous year, bringing the total deficit to $23.2 trillion.
One of the biggest concerns is the potential depletion of the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) Trust Fund by 2033. This fund is responsible for paying retirement and survivor benefits. If it runs out of reserves, Social Security benefits may face automatic cuts of up to 21% unless Congress takes action.
The financial troubles aren’t due to myths like Congress mismanaging funds or unauthorized immigrants receiving benefits. Instead, they stem from long-term demographic trends, such as declining birth rates, rising income inequality, and reduced legal immigration. As fewer workers contribute to the system, Social Security’s ability to pay full benefits becomes increasingly strained.
Trump’s Promise: Eliminating Taxes on Social Security Benefits
Most presidents avoid making bold promises about Social Security because any major change will likely upset some voters. However, Trump took a different approach. In July, he posted on his social media platform, Truth Social, that “seniors should not pay tax on Social Security.”
To understand this promise, it helps to look at how Social Security benefits are taxed. Back in 1983, Congress passed the Social Security Amendments, which introduced taxation on benefits for higher-income retirees. The logic behind this was simple: as some seniors had additional sources of income, they could afford to contribute a portion of their benefits back to the system.
The problem? The income thresholds that determine whether benefits are taxable have never been adjusted for inflation. Initially, only about 10% of retirees had to pay taxes on their Social Security benefits. But as wages and cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) have risen, nearly half of all retirees are now subject to these taxes.
Trump’s plan to eliminate these taxes would increase Social Security payments for about half of all retirees, making it a popular idea. But while this sounds great on the surface, it could have disastrous financial consequences for Social Security.
Why Trump’s Social Security Promise Will Likely Be Broken
Eliminating taxes on Social Security benefits may seem like a win for retirees, but it would make the program’s financial issues even worse. Social Security gets its funding from three main sources:
- Payroll taxes – Employees and employers each pay 6.2% of wages into the system.
- Interest from trust fund reserves – The government invests excess Social Security funds in special bonds.
- Taxes on Social Security benefits – Retirees above certain income levels pay taxes on a portion of their benefits.
The payroll tax remains the largest contributor, accounting for 91.3% of Social Security’s income in 2023. However, the taxation of benefits has become a growing revenue source. If Trump follows through on his promise to eliminate this tax, Social Security would lose nearly $944 billion over the next decade. This would widen the program’s already massive funding gap and speed up the depletion of the OASI Trust Fund.
Even if Trump wanted to keep his promise, it would be extremely difficult to pass such a measure in Congress. Changes to Social Security require at least 60 votes in the Senate, and no political party has held such a supermajority since 1979. Even within his own party, it’s uncertain how much support he would receive.
For these reasons, Trump will likely have to break his Social Security promise—and it might be the right move for the program’s future.
The Bottom Line: Tough Choices Ahead
Social Security is at a crossroads. While Trump’s proposal to eliminate taxes on benefits is popular, it would worsen the program’s financial struggles and speed up potential benefit cuts. Keeping Social Security sustainable will require difficult choices, including possible tax increases, benefit adjustments, or other funding solutions.
For now, retirees should remain informed about potential changes and plan accordingly. While politicians may promise easy solutions, the reality is that fixing Social Security will require bipartisan cooperation and tough financial decisions.
Security faces major financial problems. With a funding shortfall exceeding $23 trillion, tough decisions must be made to keep the program sustainable. President Donald Trump has vowed to support seniors, but one of his biggest promises regarding Social Security is unlikely to hold—and breaking it might actually be the best decision.
Social Security’s Financial Struggles: A $23 Trillion Shortfall
To understand why Trump’s promise may not hold, it’s essential to look at the financial health of Social Security. Each year, the Social Security Board of Trustees releases a report analyzing the program’s finances. The latest 2024 report shows that the funding shortfall has grown by $800 billion from the previous year, bringing the total deficit to $23.2 trillion.
One of the biggest concerns is the potential depletion of the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) Trust Fund by 2033. This fund is responsible for paying retirement and survivor benefits. If it runs out of reserves, Social Security benefits may face automatic cuts of up to 21% unless Congress takes action.
The financial troubles aren’t due to myths like Congress mismanaging funds or unauthorized immigrants receiving benefits. Instead, they stem from long-term demographic trends, such as declining birth rates, rising income inequality, and reduced legal immigration. As fewer workers contribute to the system, Social Security’s ability to pay full benefits becomes increasingly strained.
Trump’s Promise: Eliminating Taxes on Social Security Benefits
Most presidents avoid making bold promises about Social Security because any major change will likely upset some voters. However, Trump took a different approach. In July, he posted on his social media platform, Truth Social, that “seniors should not pay tax on Social Security.”
To understand this promise, it helps to look at how Social Security benefits are taxed. Back in 1983, Congress passed the Social Security Amendments, which introduced taxation on benefits for higher-income retirees. The logic behind this was simple: as some seniors had additional sources of income, they could afford to contribute a portion of their benefits back to the system.
The problem? The income thresholds that determine whether benefits are taxable have never been adjusted for inflation. Initially, only about 10% of retirees had to pay taxes on their Social Security benefits. But as wages and cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) have risen, nearly half of all retirees are now subject to these taxes.
Trump’s plan to eliminate these taxes would increase Social Security payments for about half of all retirees, making it a popular idea. But while this sounds great on the surface, it could have disastrous financial consequences for Social Security.
Why Trump’s Social Security Promise Will Likely Be Broken
Eliminating taxes on Social Security benefits may seem like a win for retirees, but it would make the program’s financial issues even worse. Social Security gets its funding from three main sources:
- Payroll taxes – Employees and employers each pay 6.2% of wages into the system.
- Interest from trust fund reserves – The government invests excess Social Security funds in special bonds.
- Taxes on Social Security benefits – Retirees above certain income levels pay taxes on a portion of their benefits.
The payroll tax remains the largest contributor, accounting for 91.3% of Social Security’s income in 2023. However, the taxation of benefits has become a growing revenue source. If Trump follows through on his promise to eliminate this tax, Social Security would lose nearly $944 billion over the next decade. This would widen the program’s already massive funding gap and speed up the depletion of the OASI Trust Fund.
Even if Trump wanted to keep his promise, it would be extremely difficult to pass such a measure in Congress. Changes to Social Security require at least 60 votes in the Senate, and no political party has held such a supermajority since 1979. Even within his own party, it’s uncertain how much support he would receive.
For these reasons, Trump will likely have to break his Social Security promise—and it might be the right move for the program’s future.
The Bottom Line: Tough Choices Ahead
Social Security is at a crossroads. While Trump’s proposal to eliminate taxes on benefits is popular, it would worsen the program’s financial struggles and speed up potential benefit cuts. Keeping Social Security sustainable will require difficult choices, including possible tax increases, benefit adjustments, or other funding solutions.
For now, retirees should remain informed about potential changes and plan accordingly. While politicians may promise easy solutions, the reality is that fixing Social Security will require bipartisan cooperation and tough financial decisions.
Disclaimer: This article has been meticulously fact-checked by our team to ensure accuracy and uphold transparency. We strive to deliver trustworthy and dependable content to our readers.